Video surveillance has spawned unique legal considerations.
For private use, there is no question about civil liberties. The right to free
speech and expression would guarantee your right to record and use visual data
that occurs on private property. The data itself helps protect the property
rights of the individual in this case. While some people might find aggressive
video surveillance techniques disquieting, they have the right to avoid private
property that includes this technology. Where it pertains to use on private
grounds, it should be clear to all that video surveillance works to improve the
protection of civil liberties.
In the public sphere, this is a more complicated issue.
Serious debate has emerged over the use of video surveillance technology by
governments. For example, this CBS News article details a contentious
application of red light cameras by the city government of Chicago. Many
motorists are concerned that such cameras do not properly determine the driver
of the vehicle. However, video technology is not responsible for the way that
it is applied. The courts still exist to check the application of these new
innovations. As long as proper checks exist, new developments in public
surveillance should be welcomed. If there is no reasonable expectation of
privacy, then one should not carry out activities that would be inappropriate
to review on video.
New technologies can allow business to reduce labor costs
and protect against damages. As unemployment rises, so will crime rates. This
will encourage the private use of surveillance equipment to defend against
theft and vandalism. Increased government spending will motivate public
security funding. Smarter surveillance technology could provide a better public
security with more respect for civil liberties. These technologies will be
awarded with healthy government contracts in an age of worldwide stimulus
spending.
In times of economic strife, market corrections must occur.
At the onset of a crisis, this would mean that all businesses have to change
their models. However, after this initial hit, the security industry should
expect relative growth during poor economic conditions. Security is more
important when the economy is unstable.
New technologies can allow business to reduce labor costs
and protect against damages. As unemployment rises, so will crime rates. This
will encourage the private use of video surveillance solutions to defend against theft and vandalism. Increased
government spending will motivate public security funding. Smarter surveillance
technology could provide a better public security with more respect for civil
liberties. These technologies will be awarded with healthy government contracts
in an age of worldwide stimulus spending.
In times of economic strife, market corrections must occur.
At the onset of a crisis, this would mean that all businesses have to change
their models. However, after this initial hit, the security industry should
expect relative growth during poor economic conditions. Security camera dubai is
more important when the economy is unstable.
Comments
Post a Comment